

More Thoughts on the Timbers’ Debut
By: mao | March 21st, 2011
With thirty-six hours to mull over the positives and negatives from the Portland Timbers’ opener, and after rushing to publish the original post from the press box at Dick’s Sporting Goods Park, here are several thoughts. These should be prefaced with the idea that of course one game, particularly away against the Cup holders, can define any players’ season. But with the pre-season as background and the stunning failures against Colorado at the fore, there are some points that can be made:
1. Adin Brown is too easily scapegoated – It’s true that the old, oft-injured goalkeeper was unable to prevent the Timbers from falling behind 3-0 in the first thirty minutes. It’s also true that he had opportunities to grab the ball on each of the first two goals and failed to do so, directly resulting in rebound goals for the Rapids. The flip side is that he made fantastic saves in the second half to keep the score moderately respectable and could do nothing to stop Jamie Smith’s top class goal. Ultimately, Brown’s back line failed him time and again, particularly in the first half. He could have done better, but the blame lies in defensive ineptitude.
2. Defensive ineptitude – The left side of defense in the first half was as poor as any Timbers group this space can recall. Rodney Wallace was especially offensive and Kevin Goldthwaite looked slow and incapable of sound judgement. The pair combined for the most pathetic display of the game, allowing Omar Cummings to get out of the corner and create the chance for Colorado’s first goal. Goldthwaite was lucky later when he completely misplayed a header, allowing Cummings to again get to the back line before Conor Casey narrowly missed a shot. The pair were again responsible when Kosuke Kimura nearly made the score 4-0 when he hit the side netting from the left side. John Spencer remedied the situation in the second half by removing Goldthwaite at half-time and finally relieved Wallace just after the hour. But no changes could walk back how poor those two were. Also disappointing was the supposed chemistry between Wallace and college teammate Jeremy Hall. The two shouted at each other and rarely combined for anything other than putting the ball out of bounds. Though circumstances were certainly different, the entire left side of the field looked more comfortable when Hall moved to left back and Ryan Pore moved into left midfield.
3. Pore should never have been on the right – Spencer noted after the game that he wanted to use Hall on the left to help corral Colorado’s marauding right back Kimura. That reasoning makes sense in a vacuum but the reality is that Kimura is not enough of a threat to push Pore to the right where he was unable to combine with Steve Purdy. Likewise, the total failure of Wallace and Hall to work together on the left resulted in the backs simply booting the ball upfield, ignoring the midfield and hoping for a miracle. The fast surface surely contributed as several key through balls ran a little too fast and too far for the likes of Pore, Jorge Perlaza or Hall to catch up. But this space is of the opinion that Pore should have started on the left where he is much more comfortable. When Wallace was mercifully substituted just after the hour, Hall moved to left back, Pore moved to left midfield and Khalif Alhassan took over the right midfield. This combination worked infinitely better for the short period left in the game. Hall should be considered the favorite for starting left back going forward if Wallace continues to struggle with form and/or fitness. Pore worked hard throughout the match but could not get much going on the right. His comfort on the left should translate into more and better possession on that half of the field, especially when either Sal Zizzo or Darlington Nagbe return to take back the right midfield slot.
4. David Horst is a starter – Again, the circumstances of the second half were quite different from the first. But Horst was very impressive in his forty-five minutes, in particular his ability to win headers. Horst is also comfortable on the ball and several times showed that he can bring the ball forward himself. Late on his through ball was only slightly too far for Jorge Perlaza. It’s true that not every team is going to have big, strong forwards like Colorado, but the bulky Horst can serve as an intimidating presence alongside the equally tall Eric Brunner (pictured). Whether it was based on a better showing in the pre-season or justification for bringing him up from the Second Division, Goldthwaite’s starting role looks to be ill-conceived.
5. Khalif Alhassan should be considered for a starting role, at least against Toronto – The most competent player on the ball against the Rapids was by far Khalif Alhassan. He likely does not yet possess skill enough to surpass either Nagbe or Zizzo for a full-time starting position, but in their absence, or for as long as the Timbers do not possess a serious attacking midfield option, Alhassan has much to contribute. He struggled mightily against Vancouver at the Cascadia Summit while on the right but excelled against Colorado in the same position. The most important thing Alhassan does is use the touches that maintain possession. He may not be looking for goal scoring himself but the quality of his passes and his vision on the ball are at the moment, unmatched in the Timbers’ central midfield. Jack Jewsbury can sit deeper and give Alhassan room to operate across the middle of the park. He can provide service to either wing or directly to the forwards in a way neither Peter Lowry nor Adam Moffat have shown an ability to do. This would be a bold move, if considered by Spencer, but given the disaster in the central midfield against Colorado, surely anything is worth trying, particularly against a weaker side like Toronto.
6. Adam Moffat is the biggest disappointment so far – Moffat was considered one of the key additions via the Expansion Draft as a midfielder with top level experience in a championship winning side in Columbus. Yet this pre-season, and indeed in Colorado his touches have been poor, his pace slow and his awareness seemingly nonexistent. In addition to losing the ball nearly every time he touched it in the midfield, Moffat’s miskick late on forced Brown into a strong save to prevent a fourth Rapids goal. His inclusion in the side came at the expense of Peter Lowry, who was substituted at half-time, but Moffat made no impact on the game to justify his position. Though obviously one match and several pre-season appearances is not enough to fully judge any player, Moffat has been a total disappointment.
7. The Expansion Draft plan is coming back to bite Spencer and Gavin Wilkinson – The utter failures of Rodney Wallace were in stark contrast to the composed play of Colorado left back Anthony Wallace, whom the Timbers drafted in the Expansion Draft and traded back for allocation money. Likewise, the holes in midfield left by the departures of Dax McCarty and Arturo Alvarez were glaring in the Timbers’ debut. Judgement needs to be withheld on this front too, but given the opportunity to select ten players, Portland kept only four. Brunner is a good defender and seems very much worthy of his inclusion in the side. Horst too appears to be ready to play in MLS. Both Moffat and Lowry created more questions than answers in their debuts. Clearly the Timbers thought they had a central midfielder already in the fold when they traded McCarty. Yet that failure has compromised the start of the season. Whatever the plan was, it surely has not worked out yet.
Comments
-



I’ve been furiously trying to avoid the conclusions in #7, but I can’t ignore it anymore. One RCTID twitterer (can’t remember now, I apologize) did suggest that had the deal for Anthony Wallace=allocation money not been on the table before the draft started, Wallace might not have been unprotected in the first place.


-



Ah, that’s interesting, I hadn’t heard that. Wouldn’t surprise me though. Obviously ‘the plan’ hasn’t yet come to fruition, but it’s hard to see how it can at this point.


-



I had the fortune (good and bad) of being about 20 yards away from all four of the goals on Saturday, and I must say I agree that Spencer and Wilkinson appear to have failed in building a strong defense and will need to find a better answer, especially now that they have officially given up on Gilbert.
I too hate to damn the defense at this early stage, though, because I think the elevation did play a role. In that case I have to ask why Spencer & Co. did not figure out a way to get some more high altitude training in before this match, especially considering the four years Spencer spent in Colorado. Spencer’s aggressive strategy depends greatly on fitness, and I fear the boys weren’t prepared for the thin air as they attempted their normal game plan, leaving them vulnerable especially in the first half. They made some good adjustments in the second half, but obviously it was too late by then.
In spite of the mistakes in the first half, I agree with you that Adin Brown was amazing in goal and made some tremendous saves in the second half; for a big guy, that man can fly.
I’d like to add one more concern, and that is the communication between Cooper and Perlaza. I was in prime position to witness the two of them jawing at each other during the second half, Cooper appearing to complain about Perlaza’s positioning. The language barrier may well be a factor here, and of course, being behind 3-0 tends to cause people to implode a little bit. I wouldn’t be surprised if we do end up seeing Nagbe up front once he’s healthy, if Cooper and Perlaza can’t sort out their chemistry.


-



Thanks for that! I didn’t notice the communication issues between Cooper and Perlaza as much as Hall and Wallace, though I wasn’t looking for it either. I’m sure it will take a while for those guys to get on the same page. They looked good at times individually but never really combining.


-



I wonder if it would be possible for Nagbe to slot centrally as a attacking mid. Seems like the right wing is getting pretty crowded. I am curious how a midfield of
Hall/Pore – Jewsberry – Nagbe – Zizzo
would fare. From what I have heard Zizzo can also play on the left which would allow us to slide Hall back to LB but that still leaves a ? centrally. Pore also seemed to find success as a striker at the beginning of last season albeit in D2. Perhaps he would be worth a shot in the middle?I am also a little concerned with the number of positions that Hall is currently cover for. I have him listed as LMF #1, LB #1b, and RB #2. Maybe we have another RB coming out of Gavin’s recent trip to Germany?


-



I still think the Timbers should be running a 4-3-3 with Nagbe as a withdrawn third forward, whenever he returns. You put Hall at LB, Pore on left, Zizzo on right, Jewsbury in the middle. Nagbe can be an upper midfield catalyst or the recipient of service as a forward.
But, it seems Spencer has no interest in that.
And I agree with you, it’s not good to have Hall in so many slots!


-



It will be interesting to compare draft results in a year or two, though the odd allocation money aspect will make it more difficult.
If Div 2 was anything to go by (and it may not be), North American football is not the home of tactical innovation. I was surprised to see Colorado line up in a 4-3-3 against us in the pre-season, and it wasn’t particularly effective. TFC also went with a 4-3-3, albeit in a very different shape, and it also failed. It will be interesting to watch the tactics that teams try this season.


-



Totally agree about tactics. Spencer said in the pre-season that he’d be using a 4-4-2 and a 4-3-3. To this point I believe we’ve only seen the former, despite having some pieces that could work really well in the latter.


-



I really like Hall at left mid, and I am sad that Wallace was absolutely awful and therefore we might have to move Hall to LB. Before the season all kinds of MLS writers were saying how Hall could be a breakout player as he finally would be playing in his more natural position at left mid and not have to play a fullback role. So much for that maybe.
Very interested to see the starting lineup for the game vs. Toronto. At the minimum I see Horst starting over Goldy and I hope to see Zizzo/Al Hassan on the right. I would still like to see Wallace at LB and Hall at Left mid as I just cannot believe we would trade away Dax unless our FO really thought Wallace has what it takes.


-



The real reason they traded Dax McCarty was because the FO thought they had an attacking midfielder already lined up from South America. That was a mistake, but I think bringing in Rodney Wallace instead of keeping Anthony Wallace is a bigger miss. We’ll see all of this more clearly in the longer term, but it’s looking rough so far.


-



Fair point Mao. I am still holding out hope that we get one of these two possible central mids (one likely being German?) that Paulson mentioned a bit ago. If we get that person and Rodney improves then the question could be Dax vs. Jewsbury I guess. I like Captain Jack so far.


-



I like Jewsbury too, though I’d like him to improve his accuracy on free kicks.













